|
ADDRESS
of
GOVERNOR ALF M. LANDON
Accepting the Republican Nomination
for
President of the United States
South Entrance, State House
Topeka, Kansas
Thursday Evening, July 23, 1936
Mr. Chairman, Members of the Notification Committee,
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I accept the nomination of the Republican Party for the Presidency of the United
States. In accepting this leadership I pray for Divine Guidance to make me worthy
of the faith and the confidence which you have shown in me.
This call, coming to one whose life has been that of the everyday American,
is proof of that freedom of opportunity which belongs to the people under our
government. It carries with it both an honor and a responsibility. In a republic
these cannot be separated.
Tonight, facing this honor and responsibility, I hope for the gift of simple
and straightforward speech. I want every man and woman in this nation to understand
my every word, for I speak of issues deeply concerning us all.
The citizen who assumes the direction of the Executive branch of our Government,
takes an oath that he will "faithfully execute the office of President
of the United States, and will," to the best of his ability, "preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." This oath carries
the obligation, so to use executive power that it will fulfill the purposes
for which it was delegated.
No man, in common good faith to his fellow citizens, may rightfully assume the
duties of the high office of Chief Executive and take the oath that goes with
the office, unless he shall intend to keep and shall keep his oath inviolate.
It is with a full understanding of the meaning of this oath that I accept this
nomination.
The 1936 platform of the Republican Party has my complete adherence. It sets
out the principles by which we can achieve the full national life that our resources
entitle us to enjoy.
There is not time to lay our whole program before you tonight; I can touch only
upon a few phases of it. The others, I hope to discuss with you in detail as
the campaign progresses.
I intend to approach the issues fairly, as I see them, without rancor or passion.
If we are to go forward permanently, it must be with a united nation—not
with a people torn by appeals to prejudice and divided by class feeling.
The time has come to pull together.
No people can make headway where great numbers are supported in idleness. There
is no future on the relief rolls. The law of this world is that man shall eat
bread by the sweat of his brow. The whole American people want to work at full
time and at full pay. They want homes, and a chance for their children, reasonable
security, and the right to live according to American standards. They want to
share in a steady progress. We bind ourselves with a pledge we shall not ignore,
thrust aside, or forget, to devote our whole energy to bringing these things
about.
The world has tried to conquer this depression by different methods. None of
them has been fully successful. Too frequently recovery has been hindered, if
not defeated, by political considerations.
Our own country has tried one economic theory after another. The present Administration
asked for, and received, extraordinary powers upon the assurance that these
were to be temporary. Most of its proposals did not follow familiar paths to
recovery. We knew they were being undertaken hastily and with little deliberation.
But because the measures were supposed to be temporary, because everybody hoped
they would prove successful, and because the people wanted the Administration
to have a fair trial, Congress and the country united in support of its efforts
at the outset.
Now it becomes our duty to examine the record as it stands. The record shows
that these measures did not fit together into any definite program of recovery.
Many of them worked at cross-purposes and defeated themselves. Some developed
into definite hindrances to recovery. They had the effect generally of extending
control by Washington into the remotest corners of the country. The frequent
and sudden changes in the Administration's policy caused a continual uneasiness.
As a result, recovery has been set back again and again. This was not all of
the failure. Practical progressives have suffered the disheartening experience
of seeing many liberal objectives discredited during the past three years by
careless thinking, unworkable laws and incompetent administration.
The nation has not made the durable progress, either in reform or recovery,
that we had the right to expect.
For it must be remembered that the welfare of our people is not recorded on
the financial pages of the newspapers. It cannot be measured in stock market
prices. The real test is to be found in the ability of the average American
to engage in business, to obtain a job, to be a self-supporting and a self-respecting
member of his community.
Judged by the things that make us a nation of happy families, the New Deal has
fallen far short of success. The proof of this is in the record. The record
shows that in 1933 the primary need was jobs for the unemployed. The record
shows that in 1936 the primary need still is jobs for the unemployed.
The time has come to stop this fumbling with recovery. American initiative is
not a commodity to be delivered in pound packages through a Governmental bureau.
It is a vital force in the life of our nation and it must be freed!
The country is ripe for recovery. We are far behind in expenditures for upkeep
and improvements and for expansion. The total of this demand—in industry, in new enterprises, in our homes
and on our farms—amounts to billions of dollars. Once all this consumer
demand is released, the problem will be not where to find work for the workers,
but where to find workers for the work.
One of the signs of the ending of past depressions was the launching of new
business ventures. It is true that most of them were small. Altogether, however,
they provided work for many millions of people. In the present depression this
demand for work has not yet appeared. Few new ventures have been started. Why?
Because the small business man, the working man who would like to become his
own boss — the average American — has hesitated to start out for
himself. He lacks confidence in the soundness of Federal policy; he is afraid
of what may come next.
We must dispel his fear, restore his confidence and place our reliance once
more in the initiative, intelligence and courage of these makers of jobs and
opportunities. That is why I say, in all earnestness, that the time has come
to unshackle initiative and free the spirit of American enterprise.
We must be freed from incessant governmental intimidation and hostility. We
must be freed from excessive expenditures and crippling taxation. We must be
freed from the effects of an arbitrary and uncertain monetary policy. And, through
a vigorous enforcement of the anti-trust laws, we must be freed from private
monopolistic control.
Once these things are done, the energies of the American economic system will
remedy the ravages of depression and restore full activity and full employment.
Out of this depression has come, not only the problem of recovery but also the
equally grave problem of caring for the unemployed until recovery is attained.
Their relief at all times is a matter of plain duty.
We of our Party pledge that this obligation will never be neglected. In extending
help, however, we will handle the public funds as a public trust. We will recognize
that all citizens, irrespective of color, race, creed or party affiliation,
have an equal right to this protection. We would consider it base beyond words
to make loyalty or service to party a condition upon which the needy unemployed
might obtain help. Those who use public funds to build their political machines,
forfeit all right to political consideration from true Americans.
Let me emphasize that, while we propose to follow a policy of economy in Government
expenditures, those who need relief will get it. We will not take our economies
out of the allotments to the unemployed. We will take them out of the hides
of the political exploiters. The question is not as stated by the Administration—how
much money the American people are willing to spend for relief. The question
is how much waste the American people are willing to stand for in the administration
of relief.
The destruction of human values by this depression has been far greater than
the American people suffered during the World War. When the depression began
millions of dependable men and women had employment. They were the solid citizenry
of America; they had lived honestly and had worked hard. They had dealt fairly
with the Government which, in turn, had depended upon their support.
Then they found themselves deprived of employment by economic forces over which
they had no control. Little by little they spent their life savings while vainly
seeking new jobs.
We shall undertake to aid these innocent victims of the depression.
In addition, we shall amend the Social Security Act to make it workable. We
recognize that society, acting through government, must afford as large a measure
of protection as it can against involuntary unemployment and dependency in old
age. We pledge that the Federal Government will do its proper share in that
task.
But it must be kept in mind that the security of all of us depends on the good
management of our common affairs. We must be able to produce and accumulate
enough to finance our normal progress, as well as to take care of ourselves
and of those entitled to protection.
Mounting debts and increasing taxes constitute a threat to all of these aims.
They absorb the funds that might be used to create new things or to reduce the
cost of present goods. Taxes, both visible and invisible, add to the price of
everything. By taking more and more out of the family purse, they leave less
for the family security. Let us not be misled by those who tell us that others
will be made to carry the burden for us. A simple inquiry into the facts and
figures will show that our growing debts and taxes are so enormous that, even
if we tax to the utmost limits those who are best able to pay, the average
taxpayer will still have to bear the major part. While spending billions of
dollars of borrowed money may create a temporary appearance of prosperity we
and our children, as taxpayers, have yet to pay the bill. For every single dollar
spent we will pay back two dollars!
Crushing debts and taxes are usually incurred, as they are being incurred today,
under the guise of helping people—the same people who must finally pay
them. They invariably retard prosperity and they sometimes lead to situations
in which the rights of the people are destroyed. This is the lesson of history,
and we have seen it occur in the modern world.
Our party holds nothing to be of more urgent importance than putting our financial
house in order. For the good of all of us, we must re-establish responsibility
in the handling of Government finances. We must recognize that a government
does not have an unlimited supply of money to spend. It must husband its resources
just as truly as does the head of a family. Unless it follows such a course
it cannot afford the services which the people themselves expect.
No sound national policy looking to the national welfare will neglect the farmer.
This is not because the farmer needs or wishes to be coddled, or that he asks
for undue help. It is necessary because the needs of a great nation require
that its food producers shall always stand upon a social and economic plane
in keeping with the national importance of their service.
The present Administration's efforts to produce this result have not been successful.
Payments under the Triple-A did help to tide farmers over a difficult period.
But, even before it was ruled out by the Supreme Court, the Triple-A was rapidly
disorganizing American agriculture. Some of its worst effects continue. By its
policies the Administration has taken the American farmer out of foreign markets
and put the foreign farmer into the American market. The loss of markets, both
at home and abroad, far outweighs the value of all the benefits paid to farmers.
Worse than this, from the standpoint of the public, is the fact that the Administration,
through its program of scarcity, has gambled with the needed food and feed supplies
of the country. It overlooked the fact that Mother Nature cannot be regimented.
The time has now come when we must replace this futile program with one that
is economically and socially right.
The wealth of our soil must be preserved. We shall establish effective soil
conservation and erosion control policies in connection with a national land
use and flood prevention program— and keep it all out of politics.
Our farmers are entitled to all of the home market they can supply without injustice
to the consumer. We propose a policy that protects them in this right.
Some of our farmers, dependent in part upon foreign markets, suffer from disadvantages
arising from world disorder. Until these disadvantages are eliminated we propose
to pay cash benefits in order to cushion our farm families against the disastrous
effects of price fluctuations and to protect their standard of living.
The American people, now as always, are responsive to distress caused by disasters,
such as the present drouth. Our platform reflects that spirit. We shall fulfill
its pledge to give every reasonable assistance to producers in areas suffering
from such temporary afflictions, so that they may again get on a self-supporting
basis.
Our farm program as a whole will be made to serve a vital national purpose.
The family type of farm has long constituted one of the cherished foundations
of our social strength. It represents human values that we must not lose. Widespread
ownership of moderate-sized tracts of land was the aim of the Republican Homestead
Act. This conception of agriculture is one phase of the general principle that
we stand for—preserving freedom of opportunity in all walks of life.
The benefits which will be paid under our program will go no higher than the
production level of the family type of farm.
Another matter of deep concern is the welfare of American labor. The general
well being of our country requires that labor shall have the position and rewards
of prosperity to which it is entitled. I firmly believe that labor has the right
to protect this position and to achieve those rewards by organizing in labor
unions. Surely the history of labor in the United States has demonstrated that
working conditions, wages and hours have been improved through self-organization.
The right of labor to organize means to me the right of employees to join any
type of union they prefer, whether it covers their plant, their craft or their
industry. It means that, in the absence of a union contract, an employee has
an equal right to join a union or to refuse to join a union.
Under all circumstances, so states the Republican platform, employees are to
be free from interference from any source, which means, as I read it, entire
freedom from coercion or intimidation by the employer, any fellow employee or
any other person.
The Government must maintain itself in the position of an umpire: First, to
protect the public interest, and second, to act as a mediator between conflicting
groups. One of the greatest problems of this country is to develop effective
methods of conciliation.
Taking a dispute, after it gets into a tangle, and rushing it to the doorstep
of the President is a bad way to handle a labor situation or any other situation.
In international affairs, also, the Republican Party has always worked for the
advancement of justice and peace. Following the early tradition of our country,
it has consistently urged the adjustment of international disputes in accordance
with law, equity, and justice. We have now again declared our continual loyalty
to this principle.
Republican presidents sent delegates to the Hague conferences and one of them
took the leading part in the termination of the Russo-Japanese war. Another
Republican President called a conference which, for the first time, produced
a reduction and limitation of arms on a wide scale. Still another led in securing
the treaty outlawing wars.
In purpose and achievement, our party has a record which points the way to further
helpful service in creating international understanding, in removing the causes
of war, and in reducing and limiting arms.
We shall take every opportunity to promote among the nations a peace based upon
justice and human rights. We shall join in no plan that would take from us that
independence of judgment which has made the United States a power for good in
the world. We shall join in no plan that might involve us in a war in the beginning
of which we had no part, or that would build a false peace on the foundation
of armed camps.
I turn now to the basic principles upon which our Nation is founded. America
has always stood, and now stands, first of all for human rights, for "the
life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" of the great Declaration. The prime
needs of men have not changed since that Declaration, though new means from
time to time may be necessary to meet those needs. But the great safeguards
against tyranny and oppression must not be cast away and lost. They must be
saved that men may live free to pursue their happiness, safe from any kind of
exploitation.
One cannot face this occasion and the prospect flowing from it without a sobering
reflection upon the beginnings, growth, and destiny of our nation. Our Government
was founded to give life to certain vital principles. The people embodied these
basic principles of human rights in the Federal and State Constitutions. Thus,
the people themselves, of their own free will, set up this Government. And it
is still the Government of the people. Any change which the people want they
can have by following the procedure they themselves laid down.
But for any official or branch of Government to attempt such a change, without
authority from the people, is to do an unwarranted and illegal act. It is a
substitution of personal for Constitutional Government. If added power is needed,
the people have set out how that authority may be had from them if they wish
to give it.
This, in its broad essentials, is the basic structure of our Government.
As our economic life has become more complex and specialized some need, real
or apparent, has often been urged as an excuse for a further grant of power
from the people. They have sometimes given, sometimes withheld, the desired
power.
There has now appeared in high places, however, a new and dangerous impulse.
This is the impulse to take away and lodge in the Chief Executive, without the
people's consent, the powers which they have kept in their state Governments
or which they have reserved in themselves.
In its ultimate effect upon the welfare of the whole people, this, then, is
the most important question now before us: Shall we continue to delegate more
and more power to the Chief Executive or do we desire to preserve the American
form of government? Shall we continue to recognize that certain rights reside
with the people, that certain powers are reserved for the States, and that certain
functions are delegated to the Federal Government?
Now I know that many of us, at one time or another, have become dissatisfied
and impatient with the efforts of our local and State administrations to solve
our difficulties.
At such times it has seemed to us that only a larger, more powerful unit of
Government could meet the need.
For those who have followed such a line of reasoning I have the understanding
that comes from experience. As a young man I was attracted to the idea of centralizing
in the Federal Government full power to correct the abuses growing out of a
more complex social order. When the people rejected this alternative, I was
as disappointed as anyone. But in spite of this rejection, I have lived to see
many of those abuses substantially corrected by the forty-eight state legislatures
in their fields and by the Federal Government in its field of interstate commerce.
More recently, as a small independent oil producer, I saw my industry ask for
Federal regulation because of a selfish exploitation of a natural resource,
which, once wasted, cannot be replaced. When Federal regulation failed, the
industry made progress in the solution of the problem, by turning to State action,
supplemented with interstate compacts as provided by the amazing foresight of
the makers of the Constitution.
It is not my belief that the Constitution is above change. The people have the
right, by the means they have prescribed, to change their form of Government
to fit their wishes. If they could not do this, they would not be free. But
change must come by and through the people and not by usurpation. Changes should
come openly, after full and free discussion, and after full opportunity for
the people to express their will.
The Republican Party, however, does not believe that the people wish to abandon
the American form of Government.
We propose to maintain the constitutional balance of power between the States
and the Federal Government.
We propose to use the full power of the Federal Government to break up private
monopolies and to eliminate private monopolistic practices.
In other words, the Republican Party proposes to restore and to maintain a free
competitive system—a system under which, and only under which, can there
be independence, equality of opportunity, and work for all.
A free competitive system is necessary to a free government. Neither political
nor civil liberty long survives the loss of economic liberty. Each and all of
these liberties, with the precious human rights which they involve, must be
preserved intact and inviolate.
If I am elected Chief Executive of this nation I propose to restore our Government
to an efficient as well as Constitutional basis.
I shall call to my aid those men best qualified to conduct the public business—and
I mean just that.
I shall stand back of them.
I shall hold them responsible for doing their jobs.
I shall cooperate wholeheartedly with Congress in an effective reorganization
of the numerous Government agencies, to get rid of those that are not necessary,
to eliminate duplication, to insure better administration, and to save the taxpayers'
money.
I hold that it is the right of our people to have their greatest public service
enterprise—their government—well administered.
These are some of the aims and proposals of a Republican administration that
would enter office under a pledge to conduct the public business with honesty,
frugality, courage and common sense.
In common with all my countrymen, I look forward to the America that is to be.
It should be a nation in which the old wrong things are going out and the new
right things are coming in.
It should be a country which produces more and more until there is plenty for
all, with a fair chance for all to earn their share.
It should be a land in which equal opportunity shall prevail and special privilege
shall have no place.
It should be an America that shall bring to bear the whole of her great spiritual
force in a common effort to drive the curse of war from the earth; an America
that, for the sake of all mankind as well as ourselves, shall never lose the
faith that human freedom is a practical ideal.
It is in these aims and in these works that I vision the manifest destiny of
America. Everything we need for their realization we can find, I firmly believe,
within the principles under which this nation has grown to greatness. God grant
us, one and all, the strength and the wisdom to do our part in bringing these
things to pass. |